Why We Don’t Need to be Happy With Inaccurate Representation

importance of representation

Representation and diversity in all kinds of media is a topic that has gained a lot of momentum in the past few years. While there has been some improvement, there’s obviously still a big issue with certain groups (such as people of color and members of the LGBTQIA community) being under-represented. Even when they are represented, the characters are often underdeveloped or based on overdone stereotypes. When people complain about this fact, others often try to dismiss their complaints and silence them by saying things like “you shouldn’t be complaining – be happy you’re being represented at all.”

The issue is, of course, that we don’t need to be happy with representation just because it’s representation. If we see bad representation, we should feel free to call it out because inaccurate representation can be just as harmful as no representation.

It’s important that representation is accurate. For some people, the portrayal of marginalized groups in media may be their main source of exposure to these groups. While it’s unlikely they don’t encounter people who identify as LGBTQIA in real life, they may live in an area where these people are highly stigmatized and so may not know that they’re interacting with someone who identifies as such since the person may not feel comfortable being open about their identity. Seeing characters who openly identify this way in media can help them see that they are real people and not something to be feared or hated or judged. These characters and their stories can be a learning opportunity for many people, so it’s important that we get it right.

The problem comes in when these characters are not well-developed or are based on stereotypes. If the only representation of LGBTQIA people is in white gay cis male characters who are really flamboyant and talk in a high-pitched voice and love to go shopping, then people may get the idea that that’s how all gay men are. While there are of course people who do fit that description in real life, not every cis gay male is like that. When the only representation of LGBTQIA people is in gay cis males, the entire rest of the community is left out and people may continue to hold stigmatized views of them.

These stereotypes can also perpetuate the idea that a certain narrative is the only narrative when that obviously is not the case. By relying on the same stereotypical characters or the same storylines, we erase the incredible diversity that exists within these groups. For example, a lot of LGBTQIA characters and their stories have tragic endings. You may remember a few months ago when Lexa, a woman on The 100 who had been romantically involved with Clarke (I don’t remember if she was ever explicitly called a lesbian or if she was bisexual or something else so I’m not going to give a specific label), was killed off. She was a tough character and a fan favorite, but was accidentally shot and killed by another character. This got a lot of people mad and rightfully so. A large portion of LGBTQIA characters face similar fates. While it may not seem like a big deal, especially on a show like The 100 where characters die all the time, it perpetuates this idea that LGBTQIA people can not have a happy ending. It leaves people constantly seeing the characters that are like them dying over and over again and can make them feel as though there is no hope for them – everyone who is like them is dying some tragic death, so are they doomed to suffer the same fate?

While I’m white and not really in a position to comment on the quality of representation of POC in the media, I’ve seen quite a few people voice similar feelings regarding the representation of POC. For example, Latinx characters in books are often only presented as characters who live in the inner city and struggle with drugs and violence in their neighborhoods. Of course these issues are real issues faced by many people, including Latinx, but by only including Latinx characters in these narratives, it again perpetuates the idea that all people who are Latinx struggle with violence and crime and that’s simply untrue. Believe it or not, they have other concerns too!

When people rely on the media to learn more about people they don’t know a lot about – whether it be a group that I’ve mentioned here or not – and the media representation is the same, they won’t learn any really useful information. They’re going to have it in their minds that anyone who is a gay male is really flamboyant, that members of the LGBTQIA community are doomed and can’t have a happy ending, that the Latinx community’s only problems are drugs and gang violence, etc. They’re not going to see all the incredible diversity that exists within these communities. And even people within these communities can be negatively affected. Like I mentioned previously, if all the characters that remind people of themselves end up being killed, what hope does that give them for their future? And when they don’t see any characters at all that look like themselves, that can be devastating too as it may make them feel as though they’re alone or as if they’re “freaks.” Representation can help them feel more secure in their own identities if the representation is there and reflects their situation. So many people, especially people who identify as LGBTQIA, find comfort in seeing characters that resemble them and use these characters to feel more confident in their identity.

So while getting representation in the first place is clearly very important, it is just as important that the representation shows how different people in these groups can be and is accurate. You can’t label one narrative as “the gay” narrative or “the Latinx” narrative. Those don’t exist. One person who identifies as gay is bound to be incredibly different from another who identifies the same way and it’s time that our media – all forms of it – reflect that.


Follow me on Bloglovin | Twitter | Goodreads | Tumblr | Instagram

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “Why We Don’t Need to be Happy With Inaccurate Representation

  1. This is a fantastic post, you put your points across really well and I agree with all of it! Especially the issue with stereotyping gay men, like people have this idea that a stereotype is wrong when it isn’t, it’s a stereotype for a reason in that there are people like that but it’s important to remember that not everyone is like that and when you don’t know anyone different it’s hard to realise that.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Your point about LGBT characters in media being killed off is very important. This is the community that experiences acts of violence at alarming rates, especially for Queer people of color. After the Orlando massacre, we don’t really need more LGBT characters dying on TV to elicit an intense reaction from fans. Sometimes I fear it’s done for publicity because it will garner outcries of rage from the fandoms. I hope that’s just me being cynical.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Sunday Post | June 26, 2016

  4. Great post, Kourtni! I love what you said about stereotypes perpetuating certain narratives – that’s certainly VERY true and has led to those stereotypes being pushed in real life, i.e. that gay men are flamboyant, lesbians are ‘butch’, etc.

    I agree that accurate representation of marginalised groups is so important, but I do think it’s hard for a SINGLE book to ensure that it happens – I think it’s our collective reading experience that has to be ‘diverse’, i.e. there needs to be more books with different kinds of characters and different kinds of representation to collectively reflect reality.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I totally agree that it’s hard for one book to provide completely accurate representation. I think it goes back into the idea of a single narrative – one book can’t possibly provide every possible narrative but without multiple narratives, you can’t really have truly accurate representation. I hope that made sense haha

      Like

  5. WHAT?! LEXA DIES?! This is what I get for being stuck in a country not allowed to watch The 100 online… *headdesk* Well, that’ll be something I’m looking for while catching up. *sigh*

    Now on to the real topic: I agree with you, but to a point. I think it’s very important to represent many varieties of characters of the same ‘label’. As you stated, not all gay men are flamboyant. Not all Latinos live in poverty-ridden, violence-heavy areas, and the other people of those ‘labels’ need to be represented as well. Yet, I think the biggest reason we are seeing a trend in these types of characters in not necessarily because of the media, per se, but rather has to do with the literary world. Not hear me out.

    I have noticed a lot in the past few months (as I was looking to start querying) that many of the agents (particularly in the YA world) were talking about how much they wanted ‘diverse’ books. They want those characters that are of the LGBTQIA community or are non-Causcasian. Which is understandable. They want to represent people who are not of the ‘majority’ (at least in the US.) Unfortunately, the problem with this is that many people who write novels in the US are often white (not all of them, but many of them.) And writers are told to write about what they know. So, when you tell a Caucasian writer that you want ‘diverse’ books to them it often sounds like ‘I want you to write a book with an MC who is not white or not straight or not whatever you are.’

    This is bad because how is a white man in his forties (for example) supposed to write from the viewpoint of a lesbian latino female? He has no idea what her mindset would be. Sure he can attempt it (as writers are expected to do), but the backlash for him doing it wrong is going to be astronomical. So, I don’t think it’s the writers fault because they’re getting sucked into the world of ‘what’s being published’ rather than writing about what they know and as a result are reflecting the only image they have of those people, as you were saying.

    What I’m really trying to say is that, for writers, it’s become of a bit of a Catch 22: write from the perspective you know and face not getting published or write from a diverse character’s viewpoint that you don’t fully understand and risk the backlash when it gets published. Some people fall into the second category and for that, I’m sorry. I wish people could stop focusing on getting published and focus on writing their story. Also, I think we need to focus on bringing more diverse writers into the picture because they’re the ones who should be writing diverse stories. They’re the ones who know them the best, but it seems (at least in my experience) that there aren’t enough out there (at the moment) to bring diversity into a good light.

    Like

    • I agree that it can be a problem if people are forced to or choosing to write from a perspective they don’t understand. That definitely contributes to perpetuating stereotypes since they can’t rely on personal experience and often end up relying on stereotypes. I don’t know how true it is that white authors are being faced with the decision to either write POC or not get published though. But if that is something that’s happening, that’s another problem with the publishing industry. They need to be seeking out stories about POC or the LGBTQIA community written by authors who have personal experience as a person of color or as someone who identifies as LGBTQIA or disabled rather than relying on white, cis, straight, able-bodied authors to fill every niche.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mm. You have a point. Perhaps it simply feels like we are expected to write diverse because it’s what all the agents are looking for. And no doubt we’re reading into it a bit much, but we really do need to focus on bringing in diverse authors rather than diverse characters. I think that’ll be a bigger player than having authors write about something they don’t know and punishing them for it later.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: Month In Review | June 2016

  7. Pingback: June Wrap-Up || July TBR (2016) – She Latitude

Let's Chat!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s